KEYSTONE
Governed financial execution where capability does not equal authority.
Keystone v1.0.0-rc8 is preserved here as a frozen historical baseline. It governs the execution boundary through identity, authority, permission, payload-bound authorization, fail-closed behavior, execution-time revalidation, and provenance. The point of this showcase is not to make Keystone bigger than its evidence. It is to make the evidence boundary visible.
Change the condition. Preserve the record.
Walk the registered Keystone boundary without converting historical evidence into a new finding. Each state keeps Keystone's claims separate from TA-14's independent evidentiary standing.
Keystone v1.0.0-rc8 remains the dated registered object. Its reported 256/256 system-test position and the preserved H4/H5 adverse condition travel together.
No new execution proposition is being admitted.
No TA-14 interoperability finding is created by viewing this baseline.
Interactive presentation only. This player does not certify Keystone, erase H4/H5, authorize execution, validate a successor release, or create the proposed Keystone × TA-14 FEIG interoperability finding.
Capability does not equal financial execution authority.
Walk the frozen RC8 record from identity and permission through execution-time revalidation, while keeping the preserved adverse condition attached to the version.
The weakness stays attached to the frozen version.
The RC8 record preserves a bounded trust-anchor and registration-continuity condition in which an unrelated K2 replacement could inherit a K1 checkpoint without authorized rotation. The condition is not erased by the 256/256 reported test position. Any correction belongs to a distinct successor release with its own evidence and, where applicable, re-examination.
The comparison can begin without moving either architecture.
Keystone RC8 is now a dated, attributable, versioned object that predates the proposed bounded comparison with TA-14 Financial Execution Integrity Governance. That allows the Exchange to examine overlap, complementarity, or interface without rewriting Keystone after exposure to TA-14 FEIG and without presuming that similar terminology means equivalent architecture.
Keystone × TA-14 FEIG bounded interoperability examination
Freeze one proposition before testing: can an action that satisfies Keystone identity, authority, permission, and payload-bound authorization still be withheld when TA-14 independently finds that the evidence required for admissible financial consequence lacks present standing? The examination should preserve both sovereign architectures and allow SUPPORTED, PARTIALLY SUPPORTED, NOT SUPPORTED, HOLD, or ESCALATE-type outcomes according to the evidence.