Chain FailureSimulator.
The learner is scored on preservation of the admissible route, not on whether the scenario reaches execution. Find the first broken link, preserve the last admissible state, and make the correct governed decision.
Choose the condition that breaks the route.
Each scenario isolates a different admissibility pressure: evidence decay, authority drift, runtime change, correct refusal, outcome divergence, or institutional-memory conflict.
Find the first unsupported state before consequence attaches.
Your answer is evaluated on three separate judgments: where the route first breaks, what the last still-admissible state was, and which governed decision correctly preserves the chain.
Evidence Decay Before Commit
A measurement that supported the earlier decision becomes stale before consequence-bearing commitment.
Locate the earliest unsupported state and decide whether the route may continue.
Analysis remains sealed until submission
The simulator withholds the answer until you commit to a first broken link, last admissible state, and governed response.
Reaching Execution is not the highest score.
Preserving admissibility is the goal. A correct HOLD, REFUSE, NARROW, or ESCALATE decision can be the successful result when the evidence, authority, runtime state, or consequence conditions no longer support continuation.