TA-14 ADMISSIBLE ARCHITECTURE · PUBLIC SHOWROOM

Govern the compute.
Govern the consequence.

ACA asks whether computation has standing. AEA asks whether its result has standing to become consequence. The ONUMA/BIMgenie LT-2 case shows both boundaries operating against an externally generated work order without inventing the physical state the record does not establish.

01Reality / Request
02ACA Gate
03Computation
04Bounded Finding
05AEA Gate
06Execution
07Outcome / New Reality

ONE CONTINUOUS GOVERNANCE HANDOFF

Three doors. One evidence journey.

Each architecture retains its own role. The case demonstrates their connection without collapsing model evidence, operational records, or physical reality into one claim.

THE PROOF IS THE RESTRAINT

The architecture knew where the evidence stopped.

A successful governance result is not always execution. In LT-2, the represented path earned bounded computational support and the assignment earned bounded investigation authority. Physical electrical intervention remained HOLD.

EVIDENCE CLASSES MUST NOT COLLAPSE

What the record says—and what it cannot yet say.

01

Reported

The light is not illuminating. Circuit 2 appears ON and is not visibly tripped.

02

Represented

The frozen semantic model supports a bounded upstream electrical relationship associated with LT-2.

03

Authorized

The BIMgenie assignment supports bounded, non-intervention investigation.

04

Not established

Present energized state, physical topology, defect, repair authority, intervention, or outcome.

CAPABILITY IS NOT STANDING

See the architecture, test the gate, inspect the evidence.

Inspect Work Order 3593-22790 →Explore ACAExplore AEAEarlier ONUMA Mission
TA-14 Exchange Activity

Public network activity

Live cumulative activity recorded across the public Exchange surface.

Refreshing
···VisitorsRecorded public visitors
···Page ViewsRecorded Exchange views
Network stateFOUNDING
Governance in execution · public Exchange surface online and recording cumulative activity.