JURISDICTION MODULE · US
United States AI Governance
Federal, state, local, sector, procurement, and enforcement landscape
Review United States AI governance without converting a distributed legal landscape into a single national rule. Preserve the issuing authority, jurisdiction, sector, regulated activity, effective date, enforcement basis, and relationship between federal, state, local, and voluntary sources.
AUTHORITY BOUNDARY
Preserve legal force before mapping governance.
A federal framework, agency action, state statute, municipal rule, procurement condition, sector obligation, and voluntary standard do not carry the same legal force. Each source must remain attached to the authority that issued it and the activity it can actually govern.
SOURCE FAMILIES
Enter through the authority that can govern the activity.
This module separates source families so a route can identify what is binding, what is conditional, what is interpretive, and what remains voluntary.
APPLICABILITY CONTROL
A jurisdiction name alone never establishes applicability.
A bounded legal route must identify the actor, activity, system, sector, geography, timing, authority, and triggering condition before any compliance conclusion is allowed to move toward execution.
Federal, state, local, tribal, or multi-jurisdiction activity
Developer, provider, deployer, operator, purchaser, or affected party
Public-sector, employment, credit, housing, health, education, or consumer use
Automated decision, consequential decision, generative output, or supporting tool
Existing sector law, civil-rights duty, procurement term, or AI-specific rule
Effective date, transition period, exemption, threshold, and enforcement authority
EVIDENCE EXPECTATIONS
Translate duties into inspectable records.
Evidence must support the exact claim, role, system, version, period, and jurisdiction under review. A policy statement alone does not prove execution.
System purpose, role assignment, and jurisdictional nexus
Preserve source, owner, date, scope, continuity, and review status.
Impact, risk, testing, validation, and monitoring records
Preserve source, owner, date, scope, continuity, and review status.
Notices, explanations, appeal pathways, and human-review records
Preserve source, owner, date, scope, continuity, and review status.
Data provenance, evaluation boundaries, and material-change history
Preserve source, owner, date, scope, continuity, and review status.
Procurement terms, vendor representations, and allocation of responsibility
Preserve source, owner, date, scope, continuity, and review status.
Incident, complaint, correction, enforcement, and outcome records
Preserve source, owner, date, scope, continuity, and review status.
GOVERNANCE LIBRARY RECORDS
Available sources for United States.
Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile
A companion profile to the NIST AI RMF addressing risks and actions specific to generative artificial intelligence.
Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights
A nonbinding framework describing protections for people affected by automated systems.
Federal Trade Commission Artificial Intelligence Guidance
A body of consumer-protection guidance and enforcement messaging addressing deceptive, unfair, discriminatory, and unsupported AI practices.
NIST Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework
A voluntary framework for managing risks associated with artificial intelligence across organizational and system lifecycles.
OMB Memorandum M-24-10: Advancing Governance, Innovation, and Risk Management for Agency Use of Artificial Intelligence
Federal agency guidance establishing governance, innovation, inventory, and risk-management expectations for agency use of artificial intelligence.
ROUTE QUESTIONS
Questions that must be resolved before execution.
TA-14 LEGAL IMPLEMENTATION METHOD
From official source to governed determination.
Source
Preserve the official instrument, issuing authority, version, date, language, and publication record.
Applicability
Determine jurisdiction, actor, role, system, sector, exclusions, thresholds, and timing conditions.
Requirement
Separate each obligation, prohibition, exception, responsible actor, and triggering condition.
Evidence
Identify the records, authority, controls, continuity, and outcomes needed to support the requirement.
Route
Compile the bounded requirement into bindings, commitments, execution limits, and decision gates.
Verification
Preserve the determination so another reviewer can inspect, challenge, replay, and correct it.
BUILD THE GOVERNED ROUTE
Do not turn a legal summary into execution permission.
Preserve the official source, map applicability, attach bounded evidence, identify unresolved conditions, and route the result through an inspectable TA-14 determination.