YRTA-14
TA-14 INSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE LIBRARY
Governance Year Index
Browse laws, regulations, standards, codes, frameworks, guidance, governed records, and TA-14 proposals by their preserved publication year. A year is not merely a date label. It identifies the edition, authority state, historical context, and version that may govern a later determination.
Publication establishes chronology, but it does not alone prove adoption, legal effect, current applicability, or supersession.
A newer edition may exist while an older edition remains the one incorporated into law, code, contract, policy, or certification.
Year, edition, amendment state, adoption source, and effective date must remain distinct and attributable.
YEAR CONTROL DESK
Find the year. Inspect the record. Preserve the edition boundary.
Search the institutional library by title, publisher, type, jurisdiction, domain, or year. Expand a year to inspect all records associated with that chronological point.
28matching records
1 year groups · 28 records with unresolved or unavailable year metadata
01Unknown
guidance
AI Incident Response
TA-14 AI Governance LibraryInternational
Practices for identifying, triaging, containing, investigating, documenting, and resolving AI incidents.
02Unknown
law
Artificial Intelligence and Data Act
Parliament of CanadaCanada
A proposed Canadian legislative framework intended to regulate high-impact artificial intelligence systems.
03Unknown
guidance
Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile
National Institute of Standards and TechnologyUnited States
A companion profile to the NIST AI RMF addressing risks and actions specific to generative artificial intelligence.
04Unknown
guidance
Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights
White House Office of Science and Technology PolicyUnited States
A nonbinding framework describing protections for people affected by automated systems.
05Unknown
law
Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act
Colorado General AssemblyColorado, United States
A state law governing developers and deployers of high-risk artificial intelligence systems used in consequential decisions.
06Unknown
framework
COSO Enterprise Risk Management Framework
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway CommissionInternational
An enterprise risk management framework integrating risk with strategy and organizational performance.
07Unknown
law
European Union Artificial Intelligence Act
European UnionEuropean Union
A risk-based legal framework governing the development, placement on the market, deployment, and use of artificial intelligence systems in the European Union.
08Unknown
guidance
Federal Trade Commission Artificial Intelligence Guidance
Federal Trade CommissionUnited States
A body of consumer-protection guidance and enforcement messaging addressing deceptive, unfair, discriminatory, and unsupported AI practices.
09Unknown
law
General Data Protection Regulation and Automated Decision-Making
European UnionEuropean Union
European data-protection requirements governing personal data processing, profiling, transparency, and certain solely automated decisions.
10Unknown
standard
IEEE 7000 Model Process for Addressing Ethical Concerns During System Design
IEEE Standards AssociationInternational
A standard process for identifying and addressing ethical values and concerns during system and software design.
11Unknown
standard
ISO 31000 Risk Management Guidelines
International Organization for StandardizationInternational
General principles, framework, and process guidance for managing risk across organizations.
12Unknown
standard
ISO/IEC 22989 Artificial Intelligence Concepts and Terminology
ISO and IECInternational
An international standard establishing concepts and terminology used across artificial intelligence systems and related standards.
13Unknown
standard
ISO/IEC 23053 Framework for Artificial Intelligence Systems Using Machine Learning
ISO and IECInternational
A framework describing machine-learning-based AI systems and their components, functions, and relationships.
14Unknown
standard
ISO/IEC 23894 Artificial Intelligence Risk Management
ISO and IECInternational
International guidance for organizations seeking to identify, assess, treat, monitor, and communicate risks related to artificial intelligence.
15Unknown
standard
ISO/IEC 38507 Governance Implications of the Use of Artificial Intelligence by Organizations
ISO and IECInternational
Guidance for governing bodies on the organizational implications of using artificial intelligence.
16Unknown
standard
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System
ISO and IECInternational
An international management system standard specifying requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an AI management system.
17Unknown
framework
MITRE ATLAS
MITREInternational
A knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques targeting machine-learning and AI systems.
18Unknown
guidance
Model Governance
TA-14 AI Governance LibraryInternational
Governance practices covering model approval, versioning, validation, monitoring, retirement, and accountability.
19Unknown
law
New York City Local Law 144 on Automated Employment Decision Tools
New York CityNew York City, United States
A local law regulating certain automated employment decision tools used in hiring and promotion decisions.
20Unknown
framework
NIST Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework
National Institute of Standards and TechnologyUnited States
A voluntary framework for managing risks associated with artificial intelligence across organizational and system lifecycles.
21Unknown
principle
OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentInternational
International principles promoting innovative and trustworthy artificial intelligence that respects human rights and democratic values.
22Unknown
guidance
OMB Memorandum M-24-10: Advancing Governance, Innovation, and Risk Management for Agency Use of Artificial Intelligence
Office of Management and BudgetUnited States
Federal agency guidance establishing governance, innovation, inventory, and risk-management expectations for agency use of artificial intelligence.
23Unknown
guidance
OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Model Applications
OWASP FoundationInternational
A community-developed list of significant security risks affecting applications built with large language models.
24Unknown
architecture
Runtime AI Governance
TA-14 AI Governance LibraryArchitecture
Governance applied while AI systems are executing rather than only before deployment.
25Unknown
architecture
TA-14 Admissible Execution Architecture
TA-14 AuthorityArchitecture
An evidence-bound governance architecture that determines whether a proposed action is admissible before execution and preserves the resulting outcome evidence.
26Unknown
architecture
TA-14 Reality-to-Outcome Governance Chain
TA-14 AuthorityArchitecture
A governance chain expressed as Reality, Record, Continuity, Admissibility, Binding, Commit, Execution, and Outcome.
27Unknown
principle
UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
UNESCOInternational
A global normative instrument addressing the ethical development and use of artificial intelligence.
28Unknown
principle
United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
United NationsInternational
A global framework defining state duties and corporate responsibilities regarding business-related human-rights impacts.
YEAR AND VERSION RESOLUTION
A date becomes governable only when its meaning is preserved.
TA-14 separates publication, adoption, effective date, amendment, implementation, supersession, and outcome chronology so that no date silently substitutes for another.
Identify the official title, publisher, edition, and displayed publication year.
Verify the year against the official source or an attributable authoritative record.
Separate publication year from adoption, effective, compliance, amendment, and enforcement dates.
Determine which jurisdiction, organization, contract, permit, or code adopted the edition.
Identify later editions, amendments, corrigenda, withdrawals, and superseding instruments.
Determine which edition governed the actual subject, activity, place, and time.
Bind the resolved edition to the authority, evidence, determination, and permitted execution.
Preserve the source, year, edition, adoption path, unresolved facts, and revalidation trigger.
CHRONOLOGY FAILURE MODES
Most date errors are authority errors waiting to happen.
Latest-is-applicable error
Treating the newest published edition as controlling without proving adoption.
Publication-effective collapse
Using publication year as though it were the date legal obligations began.
Historical erasure
Replacing a prior edition without preserving the authority and evidence relied upon at the time.
Amendment blindness
Citing the original act or standard while omitting material amendments or corrigenda.
Proposal inflation
Presenting a future, draft, or proposed instrument as current authority.
Unknown-year acceptance
Allowing a record with unresolved chronology to support final consequential reliance.
Cross-jurisdiction substitution
Applying the adoption date from one jurisdiction to another without authority.
Outcome-date omission
Recording the decision date but failing to preserve when reality changed afterward.
TIMELINE AND VERSION LITERACY ACADEMY
Learn why the right instrument with the wrong year can produce the wrong authority.
The Academy teaches learners to distinguish publication, effective, adoption, amendment, enforcement, implementation, supersession, and outcome dates. Learners inspect examples, resolve competing editions, run chronology simulations, and prepare a review-ready version package.
Read official chronology
Locate official editions, amendments, adoption records, and effective dates.
Compare editions
Inspect what changed and whether the difference affects duty, evidence, or execution.
Resolve adoption
Determine which authority adopted which edition for which jurisdiction and activity.
Detect supersession
Identify withdrawal, replacement, transition periods, and preserved historical reliance.
Build the package
Preserve the chronology evidence required for Applicability and Entity Review.
Revalidate
Trigger review when law, regulation, standard, code, contract, or operating context changes.
YEAR INDEX BOUNDARY
A publication year is evidence of chronology—not automatic proof of current authority.
This index organizes governance records using the year metadata preserved in the TA-14 Governance Library. It does not independently establish legal effect, official adoption, amendment status, current applicability, certification, conformity, or permission to execute. Official sources, jurisdiction-specific adoption records, contracts, permits, and qualified review remain controlling.